Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 3861 - 3880 of 5,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 11:03 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
    Sources: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/10/21/4253022_berger-to-file-bill-to-protect.html? [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
A hearing on the matter is scheduled before Judge Denlow later this month. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
The majority began by explaining that Quill is flawed on its own terms because (1) the physical presence rule was not a necessary interpretation of the substantial nexus requirement; (2) the rule creates rather than resolves market distortions; and (3) the rule imposes an arbitrary, formalistic distinction that modern Commerce Clause precedents disavow.[14] With respect to his first point, the majority explained that the question in Wayfair is whether a state may… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
In addition, the JOBS Act directs the SEC to amend Rule 144A to permit general solicitations of securities sold under Rule 144A that reach investors who are not QIBs, provided that only QIBs (or institutions reasonably believed to be QIBs) purchase such securities. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Representative opinions offer a sample of typical decisional outcomes on a given matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
Unfortunately the provision for increase in rent as introduced by amendment to the Act w.e.f. 1 st December, 1988 with insertion of Section 6A was not noticed by the said Division Bench.20. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by CFM Admin
  On May 10, 2019, the SEC proposed a series of rule amendments and guidance with the intention of improving the regulatory framework governing cross-border security-based swaps. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Upon the LUC’s request, DW submitted a written status report on June 10 showing its progress on this and other work on the property. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
As this matter was based on the diversity jurisdiction of the court, under Federal Rules of Evidence 501, California law would apply. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
(Denver was part of Arapahoe County until the adoption of the home rule constitutional amendment in 1902.) [read post]