Search for: "Johns v State" Results 3861 - 3880 of 22,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Rosalind English
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
Another liberal, John Paul Stevens, joined the majority with some caveats. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:12 am
" So, let's begin this new (and obviously fertile) department with a gem that John found "in Brooks v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:43 am
"  In this excerpt, Loftus describes her testimony in a pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
John Yoo provided the administration with a highly questionable but politically desirable interpretation of what constitutes “torture. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm by CAFE
Here’s what will work,” John Bellinger, Washington Post op-ed, 4/23/20 “Congress hands Obama first veto override,” Politico, 9/28/16 MCCONNELL STATE BANKRUPTCY COMMENTS Clip: Mitch McConnell expresses support for allowing states to go bankrupt, Hugh Hewitt radio show, 4/22/20 “McConnell takes flak after suggesting bankruptcy for states rather than bailouts,” Washington Post, 4/23/20 SUPREME COURT  Ramos v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm by Ronald Mann
United States sharply divided the justices, with an odd lineup supporting Justice Neil Gorsuch’s opinion: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Raia, 94 AD3d at 750-751; Nelson v Kalathara, 48 AD3d at 529). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]