Search for: "L. Good"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 18,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Call Our DuPage County Divorce Attorneys If you are concerned about the fate of your business during a divorce, Kathryn L. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:03 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:40 am
Hualapai Tribe, 78 USPQ2d 1696 (TTAB 2006), Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 May 2018, 3:06 am
Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Actual confusion is seldom proven at the Board.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm
Five through September, Mitchell L. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:43 am
That defense is based on the proposition that a plaintiff (opposer) cannot be harmed by a new registration when the defendant (applicant) already owns a registration for substantially the same mark for substantially the same goods or services. [read post]
TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Blue Bundle of Dental Floss Due to Lack of Acquired Distinctiveness
19 Jan 2024, 4:15 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:50 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
Here, the flags are not being displayed as flags but instead appear as torsos of individuals, signifying the international nature of applicant's goods and services.And so the Board reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here;Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 3:44 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 5:02 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:37 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:42 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 2:59 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:52 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:27 am
They are costly and disruptive, drive customers away and stop business from selling goods and services. ... [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 3:11 am
There was no evidence that consumers confused the source of the involved goods and services as the result of exposure to trademark usage of MATTRESS OVERSTOCK.Under the rule of Otto Roth, Allure could not prevail because it did not demonstrate that the term MATTRESS OVERSTOCK is distinctive.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Note that in June, Becker survived another Section 2(d) opposition to the same mark, in a case involving the registered mark OVERSTOCK.COM… [read post]
