Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 3861 - 3880 of 6,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Later on Tuesday, Kerr summarized the CA2 ACLU v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The court did not discuss the governing law of such a contract nor the jurisdiction in which disputes relating to its terms would be heard but it might be assumed that the law would be English law and the jurisdiction that of the courts of England. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm by gstasiewicz
On July 6, 2010, the Obama Justice Department filed a lawsuit challenging the law and requested a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from being enforced (USA v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm by Beth Graham
FSB, 235 S.W.3d 185, 193-94 (Tex. 2007); Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am by Jason M. Halper
Energy (USA), LLC, 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013), declined to extend deference to, and disagreed with, the SEC’s interpretation of the Dodd-Frank protections. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Reuters, USA Today, Variety and Courthouse News report. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Brandon Garrett urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
Richard Wolf of USA Today previews next week’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
In an August 15, 2013 ruling, Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the cross motions for partial judgment of plaintiff L'Oreal USA, Inc. and defendant Trend Beauty Corp. in L'Oreal's action alleging Lanham Act and state law claims against Trend Beauty. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:18 am by Howard Knopf
The result is that CIPPIC will be now be permitted to file a 20 page Memorandum of Fact and Law. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am by Larry
Continuing my effort to catch up on 2017 customs decision from the Court of International Trade, we come to Kalle USA, Inc. v. [read post]