Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 3861 - 3880 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
The similarity must be confusing to an “objective bystander,” so stated by the minority Panel in Open Society Institute v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Andrew Appel
I’ll bet that Secretary of State Raffensperger now appreciates why the Federal Court forced him to stop using those DRE machines (Curling v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Just found them via Google Alerts and only have had time to read FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
Mark Janus asks the Supreme Court to overrule its 1977 decision in Abood v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am by Jay Willis
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
  The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
As of December 2013, Schutte Inc. hadn’t designed, manufactured, or offered any products for sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which legendary boxer Muhammad Ali appealed the rejection of his application for conscientious objector status at the height of the Vietnam War”; Justice Sonia Sotomayor presided, and “Justice Clarence Thomas, who sometimes seems bored on the bench, watched raptly from a spectator’s seat. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:01 am
Supreme Court (below left) rejected the President's claim to such unilateral authority in Medellín v. [read post]