Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 14,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:35 am
Supreme Court of Florida: Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
Louisiana, this Court upheld state rules borne out of ill-will to minority defendants that allowed the conviction of defendants based upon non-unanimous juries. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:25 am
That, in a nutshell, is what the Supreme Court must decide in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
The court rejected Lewis's objection stating, `I'm imposing 6[.n.], all of it. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am
In answering the issues, the Court of Appeal relied upon the (minority) judgment of Lord Hoffman in Cambridge Gas Transportation Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings [2006] UKPC 26, and Re HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd [2008] UKHL 21, finding that foreign court proceedings could in fact be recognised in this case under the Model Law. [read post]
WHAT CONSTITUTES “SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE” TO SUPPORT AN SEC FINDING OF A FALSE STATEMENT IN A FORM U-4
31 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
In a recent decision, Toth v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 3:03 pm
I printed out the decision in J.D.B. v North Carolina (564 U.S.______ 2011) and I think I sacrificed a whole tree, it was so thick. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
Judgment McFarlane P dismissed the application to vary the injunction, save for some minor amendments which had been agreed by the parties. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:23 am
In Garay v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:15 am
I have the Nearly Legal leadership's indulgence in allowing me to post about Patel v Keles [2009] EWCA Civ 1187 which touches on one of the more unnatural (at least to housing lawyers) areas of my practice, namely the renewal of business tenancies under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, and which may be of interest to a minority only of our readers. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:00 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court in Sprint Communications Co LP v APCC Services Inc divided on the question whether an assignee for collection of federal debts satisfied Article III standing. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:22 am
Ct. 1199 (2015)Skidmore v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
That issue is posed in Reynolds v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Mr Handzhiyski, who was unemployed, was arrested that afternoon, then charged with minor hooliganism in relation to the placing of the hat and sack. [read post]
2 May 2009, 6:07 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
