Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
The June 27, 2012, decision in Minn-Chem, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
See Para-Ordnance Mfg., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:40 pm
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Cowbell (see, eg para 10) confirms the adoption of the European “global appreciation” approach in Sabel V Puma, in principle, as the basis for applying the local infringement test, so there is clearance from the SCA to use the European approach.The upshot of all of this is that a formulaic approach has been developed in Europe and is well applied, most notably by the Community Trade Mark Office. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
There are some very nice and straightforward clarifications in the recent Federal Court decision inWarman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:27 am
See e.g., Shugarman Surgical Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
Para 8 of the CCI order states that “[t]he amount of penalty determined in case of different entities must...be deposited within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of this order”. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:41 pm
¶24. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
” This rule was first articulated in R. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Thus the court said (at para. 41): “... [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:21 pm
”The petition for review, Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:19 pm
The June 18 decision is Agnew v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:03 pm
Gotovina, IT-06-90-T, para. 7. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
The petition for review, FTC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:14 am
Liverpool City Council v Kassim [2011] UKUT 169 (LC)A thank you to the EHP who brought our attention to this case. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:14 am
Liverpool City Council v Kassim [2011] UKUT 169 (LC)A thank you to the EHP who brought our attention to this case. [read post]
Balancing freedom of expression against the right to private life - Kurier Zeitungsverlag v. Austria
24 Jun 2012, 1:37 am
In Kurier Zeitungsverlag und Druckerei GmbH v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:24 am
Dep’t of Agriculture, 109 MSPR 115, ¶11 (2008); Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
City of San Francisco, et al., ¶;¶ 97-98. [read post]
