Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 18,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:24 am
Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
After the woman obtained an order of protection, the miscreant was initially fired, but (inexplicably) he was later rehired.Believing that such conduct violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:55 am
Vault Cargo Management, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:50 pm
The floating NAV is intended to address the heightened incentive for shareholders that have to redeem shares in times of high volatility and to improve the transparency of money market fund risks through more visible valuation and pricing methods. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:53 pm
Thus, for 20 years the company can charge “name brand” prices for the medication it has developed and generate profits that are commensurate with all of that investment, rather than merely with the cost of manufacture and distribution. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
”In a written statement, EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Dale Price noted that, “Employees should not have to check their religious beliefs at the workplace door …. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:00 am
District Court Western District of Michigan (EEOC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:03 pm
On June 21, 2022, the plaintiff’s attorney sent the SEC a letter requesting records pertaining to communications the Commission had with representatives for exchanges, market makers, retail broker-dealers, industry organizations and/or similar entities about retail stock order handling and execution, price improvement, order-by-order competition and routing to auctions. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
DiMaria had also been charged with taking advantage of the manipulation to sell Bankrate stock at inflated prices. [read post]
Constitutional or not, court allows registration requirement for sex-offenses predating registry law
22 Feb 2014, 4:23 am
Read the opinion.Dissent (Price, J.) [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
" Intelligent Verification Systems, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:08 am
" Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1945, the Supreme Court blessed a lesser known type of agency deference in Bowles v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 8:35 pm
Residuals v. royalties. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:19 pm
Goldstein In Pizza Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:38 pm
Since the missing information kept the IRS from being able to evaluate its reported contribution without an audit, the Tax Court determined that substantial compliance could not be used to save the taxpayer from having its deduction disallowed.RERI HOLDINGS I, LLC, JEFF BLAU, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, v. [read post]
