Search for: "Scales v. State"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
Specht v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
— in California v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Representative, and a state court judge; and even members of the public invited to the FBI’s Citizens Academy. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 1:49 am
Philippines v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Chair: Daphne Keller: EU heavy compliance obligations + a bunch of other laws coming into effect right as platforms are laying off people who know how to do that—a bumpy road. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
United StatesLindke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 11:50 pm
There was a case in 1996, (Princeton University Press v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
M.C. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
Claim handlers continue to wrestle with enduring long-tail Exchange Act claims, federal and state Securities Act claims, and shareholder derivative suits without respite. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
Moreover, as individuals move from city to city and state to state, they leave a trail of partial medical records with various providers, insurers, and others. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
Plaintiff asserted claims under the Consumer Product Safety Act and state law. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
