Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 3861 - 3880
of 13,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Canby, Richard R. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:01 am
Craig Colby v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
’ State v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:28 am
Formerly, R. 6(4) stated that the litigation guardian “shall act by a solicitor…” R. 20-2(4) now states that the litigation guardian “must act by a lawyer…”. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:31 am
§ 2423(c) and (f)(1). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Justice Scalia wishes the court had expressed no opinion about expressing no opinion
5 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
The case is Wednesday’s Rosemond v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
(c), 2030.300, subd. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
R. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:59 pm
In Marion v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
Hartnett, Supreme Court Practice §5.12(c)(3), p. 351 (9th ed. 2007). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Statutory presumption that an individual suffered a disease of the heart as a result of the performance of duty rebutted by medical evidence to the contrary Lawless v DiNapoli, 56 AD3d 1114 A member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System [NYSERS] applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits alleging that he was permanently incapacitated as the result of a heart attack he suffered approximately six months earlier. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May… [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
Here, the Court stated the precedent, didn't follow it, but pretended like it did. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
In Morrissey v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:02 am
Gur v Nadel & Clarlo, P.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
In re C. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
D & C. [read post]
