Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Homesteads apply to “homes” owned by sole owners, joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, tenant in common, life estate holders, and the holders of beneficial interests in a real estate trust holding title to a residence. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
A recent example of such an opposite result is the case of Jim Wells County Appraisal District v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court’s reversal of Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court’s reversal of Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In the Jones Case (2012) (United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Furthermore, under its 2014 decision in Mendoza v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
Brittex Financial v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
The Rogers v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 1:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2024, 3:47 am
As regards the relevance of Article 351 TFEU, AG Szpunar interpreted the provision as not allowing a Member State to apply, by way of derogation from the provisions of EU law, the reciprocity clause currently contained in Article 2(7) BC against the holder of the copyrights on a work whose country of origin is the US.CommentWhether you like it or not (and, like with RAAP, it is anticipated that many people will not like it), the Opinion of AG Szpunar is perfectly aligned with… [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am
, United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm
That decision, Crawford v. [read post]
