Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 173,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The case of OPQ v BJM ([2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)) addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:43 pm
If the answer is “always yes,” the state autonomy protected by Printz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Nevertheless, where state secrets are not disclosed to a court of law because of these interests, the resulting state of affairs is ‘tantamount to a removal of the court’s jurisdiction by executive ipse dixit’ (i.e. by the executive branch’s own say-so: Devenney v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:45 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court opens its new term with a number of international law and executive power v. power of Congress cases. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 pm
In L.M.B. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
This objection is mostly misguided.In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:03 am
The law should not accord the state of Georgia a copyright over its code of law, even if the code has annotations [Trevor Burrus and Sam Spiegelman on Cato amicus certiorari brief in State of Georgia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 7:44 am
By guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Contracts are a state-law issue. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 11:18 am
Henning Lahmann (ESMT Berlin - Digital Society Institute) has posted 'Hacking Back' by States and the Uneasy Place of Necessity within the Rule of Law (Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, forthcoming). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Miles Laboratories, Inc., 927 F.2d 187, 191 (4th Cir. 1991) (applying Maryland law); Brooks v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:46 pm
Did the lower court commit plain error in remarking, in front of the jury, that the State had presented sufficient evidence to convict Mr. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
The applicable substantive law remains state law. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
To read the Court’s opinion in the case, Astrue v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
