Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 10,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2016, 1:48 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Silva v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
Segovia v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:36 pm
New Park Towers Condominium Assoc., Inc., No. 07-60512-CIV, 2008 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
Jerry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:33 am
" The style of the case is Travelers Indemnity Company v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
The style of this case is, Jose Manuel Campa Gonzalez v National Insurance Crime Bureau; Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:41 am
Daves v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
In 2003, the Houston Court of Appeals, 14th Dist. issued an opinion in the case, Alejandro Armendariz and Alma Armendairz v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:59 am
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in 1994, in the case, Celtic Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
Last week, in Park v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Citing a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Francis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Attorney in Utah pursued the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:34 am
That authority was Colon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
Quakenbush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
The Supreme Court disagreed and stated that there were no provisions in the CMR that state that all closely connected claims must be brought under one set of proceedings. [read post]
