Search for: "State v. Person" Results 3861 - 3880 of 76,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am by John Jascob
Instead, the Commission has simply defined “qualified purchaser” to mean “any person” that purchases a security in a Tier 2 offering. [read post]
31 May 2015, 8:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It took the Court of Appeals 2.5 years to reach a decision in this case, holding in a 2-1 vote that the State of New York can regulate this speech.The case is Children First Foundation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:11 pm by Dan Filler
One of the interesting questions coming out of the Supreme Court's decision today in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In S v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-304/14) (“CS”), it held that “in exceptional circumstances a member state may adopt an expulsion measure…”. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is also stated in the 1993, Dallas Court of Appeals opinion, Jones v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 am by Gherson Immigration
It states: (1) This section applies where a person has made an asylum claim and – (a) his claim has been rejected by the Secretary of State, but (b) he has been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a period exceeding one year (or for periods exceeding one year in aggregate). (2) The person may appeal to the Tribunal against the rejection of his asylum claim. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
   (f) (1) For purposes of this section, "personal information" does not include publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, state, or local government records. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Jay Eng
In the decision, the court found that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]