Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 6,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Marion County Election Board The key United States Supreme Court case analyzing the constitutionality of state voter ID laws is the 2008 case of Crawford v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:20 am
Corrosion Proof Fittings v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
The intent was to make the provisions as strong as possible. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:13 am
“U.S. companies” are not limited to companies based in the United States, but include companies listed on a U.S. exchange or required to file reports with the SEC. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:04 pm
(CNN Money, Nov. 28; decision in American Council of the Blind v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
Please address application packets to: Matthew Maddox Program Coordinator United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia Albert V. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:03 pm
While this paper draws largely upon common law sources from the United States and Canada, metaphor provides a core form of cognitive scaffolding across legal traditions. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm
In a follow up to last year’s blog entry regarding the case Association of Molecular Pathology, et al. v United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al we continue to look into this potentially revolutionary biotechnology case. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 4:10 pm
While this paper draws largely upon common law sources from the United States and Canada, metaphor provides a core form of cognitive scaffolding across legal traditions. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
An Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) told him to proceed with drafting the affidavit. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm
They reflect a strong public policy, as determined by legislative bodies and courts, that "it is unjust to fail to put the adversary on notice to defend within a specified period of time and that `the right to be free of stale claims in time comes to prevail over the right to prosecute them.'" United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
These together define a means of declaring law that remains influential in the United States. [read post]
