Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 3861 - 3880 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2011, 5:29 pm by Brandon L. Spurlock
It remains to be seen if this decision remains viable when the Supreme Court rules later this year in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
As a general matter, "[t]he more likely a mark is to be remembered and associated in the public mind with the mark's owner, the greater protection the mark is accorded by trademark laws. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Sam Conforti
  Employer v employee   Theft of IP and other sensitive information from companies is very common. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
And it isn’t as if granting such immunities and protections will lower the incidence of malpractice, which already causes up to 98,000 deaths a year according to the Institute of Medicine. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Typical is a case in Michigan: T & J Towing v Kurtz. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
To get the snapshot, a patient consumes a dose of radioactive juice that decays, emitting positrons that the PET picks up. 4,958,080, owned by Siemens, claims a detector useful for PET scans. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Internet service providers are corporations which can well afford the cost of setting up self-regulation systems of this nature. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:19 am by randal shaheen
  A lawsuit was then filed under various Texas Consumer Protection Statutes, and the NFL has since sweetened its offer. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Deepak Gupta
  Among other things, this year's two-day program will: Explore the impact of the consumer-related provisions of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform Act, including:  Title X's creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Title XIV's impact on mortgage regulation   Analyze the Dodd-Frank Act's impact on federal preemption standards and state regulatory perspectives Examine the impact of AT&T v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm by Stephen Page
Because of the father’s behaviour, she did her best to protect the child from him and, thus, there was little one on one contact between the child and father. [read post]