Search for: "The Nassau" Results 3861 - 3880 of 6,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 11:55 pm
County of Nassau, where the Court of Appeals on August 19 affirmed a Title VII retaliation verdict in favor of the plaintiff (a verdict in which the plaintiff received more than $600,000 in front pay, by the way).A juror was seen talking with a witness. [read post]
21 May 2011, 2:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have offices in NYork City, including Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island and The Bronx and in Nassau County, Suffolk County and Westchester County. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:56 am
Thomas Ford NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeCorporation Indispensable Party in Shareholder Derivative Action, Must Be a Named Defendant Armstrong v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Forquignon NASSAU COUNTYInsurance Law Court Modifies Order, Clarifying an $850 Limitation On Attorney's Fees Applies to Each Cause of Action Midwood Total Rehab. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
Mendel Rosenfeld & Chaya Rosenfeld NASSAU COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawRespondent Given Permission by Tenant Prior To Her Death to Live in Apartment; Not a Squatter Town of Hempstead Housing Authority v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:31 am
In all criminal cases in the state of Florida, including charges in Duval, Clay and Nassau Counties, the State Attorney's Office makes the final decision on whether charges will be filed. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:58 am by Robbie L. Vaughn, Esq.
We are conveniently located in the heart of Nassau County, Long Island, at 217 Willis Avenue in Mineola, NY 11501. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Greenfield, Stein & Senior LLP NASSAU COUNTYCivil Practice Partner Directed to Appear at Deposition, Answer Questions Regarding Dispute in Prior Partnership Lipp v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:24 am
NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticePlaintiffs' Prior Action Dismissed for Neglect To Prosecute Making Current Action Untimely Quintana v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have offices in New York City, including Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island and The Bronx and in Nassau County, Suffolk County and Westchester County. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have offices in New York City, including Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island and The Bronx and in Nassau County, Suffolk County and Westchester County. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have offices in New York City, including Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island and The Bronx and in Nassau County, Suffolk County and Westchester County. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division agreed that Civil Service Law §61(2) prohibits out-of-title work except during an emergency situation but noted that “work is not considered out-of-title if it is related to, similar in nature to, or a reasonable outgrowth of, the employee's ‘in-title’ work,“ citing Healy v County of Nassau, 18 AD3d 873. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:23 pm by Jules M. Haas
New York Guardianship Attorney Jules Martin Haas, Esq. has been representing clients in New York Guardianship Proceedings, throughout the past 30 years in New York, including Queens and Nassau Counties. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Jules M. Haas
New York City Guardianship Attorney Jules Martin Haas, Esq. has been representing clients in New York Guardianship Proceedings, throughout the past 30 years in New York, including Queens and Nassau Counties. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 5:30 am
In a decision by Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Leonard B. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
Casino Construction NASSAU COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Tenant Granted Judgment Directing Specific Performance of Purchase Option in Lease Long Beach Medical Center v. 249 East Park Corp. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:30 am by Carlos Kelly
Impact of Appeal’s Court Decision The decision is remarkable because only a few months ago, in February 2015, the First District Court of Appeal, which covers thirty-two counties in North Florida from Escambia County in the west to Nassau, Duval, and Clay Counties in the east, ruled that the Bert Harris Act does not provide a cause of action to property owners whose property was not subject to any governmental regulation. [read post]