Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 3861 - 3880 of 11,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am by Rachel Sandler
The Act grants the USOC exclusive rights to the word “Olympic” in almost any commercial setting.[7]  In 1987, the United States Supreme Court enjoined a California-based athletics company from using the word “Olympics” finding that the Act went beyond normal trademark protections. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Keith E. Whittington
In such cases, proponents of departmentalism argued that the courts had allowed Congress to do by statute what it had been barred from doing under the Constitution. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Union of India [pdf], where the Indian Supreme Court ruled that political candidates and relatives right to privacy bars disclosure of their source of income. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6262 Issue: Whether, under the Supreme Court’s opinions in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6769 Issues: Whether, under the Supreme Court’s opinions in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held that a guilty plea does not bar a defendant from challenging the constitutionality of the statute of conviction on direct appeal. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
And also, the fact that if you sue an insurance company in state court, and the carrier has a basis upon which to remove the case to federal court, they’re going to do it. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
And also, the fact that if you sue an insurance company in state court, and the carrier has a basis upon which to remove the case to federal court, they’re going to do it. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
  The basis of 3Taps’s complaint is last year’s hotly-debated California district court ruling (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Two years later, another challenge to the agency fees returned to the Supreme Court, this time brought there by a group of California public-school teachers. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 6:24 am
The dominant features in the shareholder litigation environment in California today are fragmentation and uncertainty: Plaintiffs’ bar fragmentation means ‘too small to sue’ no longer applies Uncertainty as to whether IPO lawsuits can be brought in state court or only Federal Uncertainty in the evolution of merger and fiduciary duty suits Uncertainty as to the strength of the Safe Harbor for forward looking statements Uncertainty as to the… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:23 pm by Steve Kalar
Thanks to the Citizen’s Protection Act (and through the local rules of District Courts likethe ND Cal.), California rules of professional conduct apply (we contend) to AUSAs practicing in the Golden State. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 5:51 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
B268271 (2nd District, Div. 5, Nov. 27, 2017) (slip op. available here), the California Court of Appeal affirmed that “an appropriate correction offer under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act [“CLRA”] does not prevent a consumer from pursuing causes of action for fraud and violation of the UCL [Unfair Competition Law] based on the same conduct, because the remedies are cumulative. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But if they want to do off-label stuff like remix, reverse engineering, follow-on innovation, doesn’t this bar that? [read post]
Last year California enacted Labor Code Section 925, which restrains the ability of employers to require employees to litigate or arbitrate employer disputes outside of California or under the laws of another state. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:18 am by Scott Bomboy
Abbott, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that a state couldn’t be barred from using total population to determine a voting district. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Constitution Daily reports that yesterday was the anniversary of the signing in 1879 of “a new law that would admit women as members of the Supreme Court bar and allow them to submit and argue cases at the high court. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
District Court for the Northern District of California ordered the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court to revisit its Citizen United ruling. [read post]