Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 3861 - 3880 of 7,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
Circuit Court has ruled that those lawsuits may go forward. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:01 am
As mentioned in an article in the Sacremento Bee, the case involved a San Diego car accident victim who sustained injuries when a Hamilton Meats truck attempted to execute an illegal U-turn and struck the victim's vehicle. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
She could not be compelled to arbitrate her SOX claim because Dodd-Frank’s amendment to SOX rendered the Form U-4 agreement to arbitrate unenforceable as to that claim. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
A ministra acrescentou, ainda, que a defesa ajuizou ações no STJ e na Suprema Corte, às vésperas da data do júri, com o objetivo de suspender o julgamento, pretensão esta que já havia sido negada pelo juízo de Chapecó, visto que os recursos em tramitação não possuíam efeito suspensivo. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am by Mays & Kerr LLC
Supreme Court threw out the Sixth Circuit’s ruling and ordered the Sixth Circuit to reconsider its ruling in the FTS case and, in doing so, consider the standards announced in the high court’s 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am by Mays & Kerr LLC
Supreme Court threw out the Sixth Circuit’s ruling and ordered the Sixth Circuit to reconsider its ruling in the FTS case and, in doing so, consider the standards announced in the high court’s 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by John Elwood
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  As happens in cases between siblings, Savitt v Krinsky 2020 NY Slip Op 31590(U) May 27, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154052/2019  Judge: W. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 11), there is no longer a limit comparable to the one at issue in Burns on the variances from Guidelines ranges that a District Court may find justified under the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
  In the 2014 opinion, the judge is ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss “Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint”, which is presumably a successor to the Complaint at issue earlier; Iqbal may have repled the FISA claim in the amended Complaint. [read post]