Search for: "US v. John Doe" Results 3861 - 3880 of 11,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In an opinion laden with Chief Justice John Roberts’ historical and rhetorical flourishes, a unanimous Supreme Court in Hall v. [read post]
Aug. 3, 2016) (finding the doctrine helpful for understanding why an employee’s duties at Papa John’s would almost certainly require him to draw upon and use Panera’s trade secrets). [5] The DTSA prohibits injunctions that conflict with applicable state law precluding restraints on employment. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  But let us imagine that all the documents prove that there is tax evasion, and on a massive scale. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Her opinion begins: Appellant John Turner asks us to overrule nearly four decades of circuit precedent holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to preindictment plea negotiations. . . . [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm by Jennifer McGrath
In August, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am by William Ford
Paul Nakasone remarked that he does not want his friends or family to use Huawei devices. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Amy Howe
But Breyer’s statement focused on the second question raised by Hidalgo, who argued that the scheme that Arizona used to sentence him to death does not, as the Supreme Court has required, “genuinely narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty. [read post]