Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 3861 - 3880 of 4,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:11 am
  The United States does not recognize these rights, with one very limited exception, and restricts the copyright incentive to economic rewards. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:48 am
Post by Sherry Colb In my column for this week, I write about the Supreme Court's upcoming case, United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:42 am by Steven Koprince
United States, No. 12-597C (2013) involved Miles Construction’s request for reimbursement of its attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:01 pm by Barry Barnett
”  That sounds an awful lot like the plausibility standard that the United States Supreme Court created for federal Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:14 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The balance here is strikingly parallel to what we saw in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:10 am by SHG
This got me thinking of Alexis de Tocqueville, who famously said that “[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Miller, No. 05-5235 Denial of habeas petition is reversed where the only evidence identifying a criminal defendant as the perpetrator is the testimony of a single witness, and where the memory of that witness is obviously impacted by medical trauma and the all-important identification is altered after the administration of medical drugs, the failure of defense counsel to consider consulting an expert to ascertain the possible effects of trauma and pharmaceuticals on the memory of the… [read post]