Search for: "United States v. Cooper"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Specialized Units Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:17 am
The Proposed Amendments also take into account the Supreme Court’s landmark holding in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:09 am
Likewise, a mere tip from United States agents to foreign authorities is not enough.The following factors are important in this analysis:(1) whether the United States agents instigated or helped plan the search;(2) the degree of cooperation between foreign officials and United States agents in the investigation;(3) the degree of participation by United States agents in the search;(4) evidence that United… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:49 am
Cooper v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
- ‘indirect consumer tax’ to fund UN public health initiatives (Afro-IP) Canada: Submissions on Canada-EU trade deal: Canadian Generic Pharma Assoc. wants IP out (Michael Geist) Canada: Intellectual property and agriculture – CDC Triffid seed story (ipblog.ca) EU: Records of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd expert meetings on SPCs (The SPC Blog) EU: Cooperation between Board of Appeal and National Court / acceleration of appeal proceedings: Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:49 pm
The United States Court in Miranda v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
“Bush v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:15 am
Subscription required for online access: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/subscribe.jsp Supreme Court Announces Special Sitting Thursday "The long wait for the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
” Solicitor General’s PerspectiveMalcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, supporting neither party’s theory. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:00 am
Payton is known for his successful record in some of the most important and visible civil rights cases in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:33 am
Super. 158, 164 (App.Div.1967); see United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
