Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 6,867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:07 pm
Attorney's Office, EDNY David E. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
The Apple v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:07 am
Miller, and Ryne V. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
David P. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
United States, John posted the comments of Edwin Williamson, former Department of State Legal Adviser in the George H.W. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
United States, which Matt Danzer summarizes here, offers more guidance on the First Amendment and terrorism than Ben and the always-thoughtful Marty Lederman have suggested. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am
In the end, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:40 pm
United States, 502 U.S. 46 (1991)], we need go no further. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Next came the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, including the significant section 702, which enabled collection against foreigners reasonably believed to be outside the United States to proceed, not under probable cause requirements, but under a Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General approved certification, and under targeting and minimization procedures approved by the FISC. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 8:20 pm
And for those readers who remember my post last month about the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:53 am
Second Lawsuit: Young v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Degirolami, (Religion and Human Rights 8 (2013)).Nora Abdul Hak & Hanna Ambaras Khan, The Application of Sulh in Resolving Community Disputes, (Paper presentation at in 1st World Congress on Integration and Islamicisation of Acquired Human Knowledge (FWCII-2013)).Susannah William Pollvogt, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:42 am
United States, the bizarre Supreme Court case in which a Pennsylvania woman was convicted of using a toxic chemical in an attempt to poison her husband’s lover. [read post]
