Search for: "W. D."
Results 3861 - 3880
of 13,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 11:32 am
Ct. 1943), aff’d, 136 N.J. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:30 pm
The Board dismissed the Patriots' Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark 19-0 THE PERFECT SEASON for various clothing items because Applicant William A. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:01 am
Steven W. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 pm
Riley, Alex W. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:38 am
” The GAO continued: [W]e do not agree with A&D that reserving the substantial confidence past performance rating for offers that identified four or more relevant projects reflected the use of an unstated evaluation criterion. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:25 am
Murphy v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am
McDougal v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:21 am
Schwartz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:55 pm
Leaving a will is the best way to ensure that property left in your estate after you pass away goes to the people you want to receive it. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:54 am
Bell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:12 am
Albrecht v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:13 am
Here: Doc. 1_Complaint (04.11.18) Doc. 16 and 16-1_Defs’ Motion to Dismiss (06.05.18) Doc. 22_Pltf’s Response in Opp to Defs MTD (08.10.18) [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:18 am
City of Monroe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
Schneider v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:21 am
McClean v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
Bailon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:03 am
Truman v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:42 am
Wollte man dies anders sehen, würde nach Auffassung der Kammer die aufschiebende Wirkung der Beschwerde unterlaufen werden. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
Zu prüfen ist also, ob der Fachmann unter Heranziehung des allgemeinen Fachwissens den beanspruchten Gegenstand als - explizit oder implizit - unmittelbar und eindeutig in der ursprünglichen Fassung der Anmeldung offenbart ansehen würde (Punkt 4.5.4 der Entscheidungsgründe). [read post]