Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 3881 - 3900 of 11,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:03 am

 
 
 NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS
 Free: Rents on Stuyvesant Complex Units Were Illegally Decontrolled 
 
 Government
 
 Settlement Agreement Terms Statutorily Protected; FOIL Disclosure Exempted Under POL §87(2)(a)
 Matter of McFerrin-Clancy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:23 pm by Andis Kaulins
In fact, the earlier non-precedential 2008 per curiam decision in Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am by Eleonora Rosati
 Cartagz requested pursuant to 37 CFR 202.5(c) that the Office reconsider its refusal a second time, on the basis that the Office had applied a higher creativity standard than warranted by copyright law, that following Harcourt, Brace & World Inc. v Graphic Controls Corp 329 F. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Fiduciary Duty: Trust Funds) Tenorio v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:19 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania punts an easy one: Counts I and II of the complaint arise under the Truth in Lending Act (&;quot;TILA"), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Appeal is premature where related indemnity claim is pending in trial courtPROFORMANCE PLASTERING OF PENSACOLA, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:45 am by Scott McIntyre and Erika Spears
The dissenting opinion relied in part on Mediaone of Greater Florida, Inc., 340 NLRB 277 (2003) and Community Hospitals of Central California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:42 pm by Scott McIntyre and Erika Spears
The dissenting opinion relied in part on Mediaone of Greater Florida, Inc., 340 NLRB 277 (2003) and Community Hospitals of Central California v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
The May 2020 decision is a blow to the Agricultural industry who was hopeful for a similar outcome in Europe to that of the United States Supreme Court here in JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124, (2001), litigated by the attorneys here at MVS. [read post]