Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
TurkeyCASE OF SALDUZ v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Circuit: Ali v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
Mikel v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:41 am
The idea that the Court is untroubled by broad delegations of power to the President in foreign affairs is most commonly traced to the Court’s 1936 decision United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
And lastly, a “reality check ”: There are three branches of government and I quote Beeson ’s perfect summation: “Now it ’s for the Court to check the Executive branch. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:42 pm
The Supreme Court decision in Samantar v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
” Bill Mears reports for Fox News that the case “is part of a larger effort by red states to pass laws regulating abortion to test how supportive the new justices will be of precedents like Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
I finally had a chance to read the amici brief of constitutional law professors urging the Supreme Court to review the Seventh Circuit's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
A landmark United States Supreme Court case called Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:13 am
Even if litigants succeed in obtaining standing in some case, they will still face a daunting barrier in the state of the doctrine on justiciability and political questions, which could lead the courts to step back and defer to Congress as the appropriate branch to devise a remedy. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:48 pm
Much like a chief of staff, the counselor to the chief justice is a vaguely defined position with broad responsibilities, including helping the chief oversee the Judicial Conference of the United States and serving as the chief’s representative to other branches of government, foreign courts, and visiting dignitaries. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:19 pm
" Assuming, arguendo, the Tax Court judges do exercise "the judicial power of the United States" (and not executive power), Congress impermissibly granted to the President a cross-branch power to remove these judges. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
The decision in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 10:49 am
Orrick said only Congress, not the President or other Executive Branch officials, can impose new conditions on how federal money is handed out in grants. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
Moore A federal grand jury in New York Jan. 3 indicted three Swiss men working as client advisers to a Swiss bank for helping U.S. taxpayers hide more than $1.2 billion in assets (United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:22 am
State v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
In Reed v. [read post]
