Search for: "Brown v. Justice" Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
New York: Wolters Kluwer, c2011 KF245 .B68 2011 See Catalog Civil rights movements -- Georgia -- Atlanta -- History COURAGE TO DISSENT: ATLANTA AND THE LONG HISTORY OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT / TOMIKO BROWN-NAGIN Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011 KF4757 .B74 2011 See Catalog Civil unions -- Law and legislation -- United States MAKING IT LEGAL: A GUIDE TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS & CIVIL UNIONS / FREDERICK C. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:53 am by Conor McEvily
Finally, commentators continue to discuss Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:51 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In so doing it may introduce innovations in the interests of justice. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:23 am by SHG
Instead, the lawsuit builds on a 2003 United States Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
We don’t discuss constitutional law much here at Abnormal Use, but after learning of last week’s ruling in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:55 pm by Legal Talk Network
Dukes, to the court’s rejection of a ban on violent video games, Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Kiran Bhat
As Conor noted yesterday, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
”  And writing for the Opinionator blog of the New York Times, Stanley Fish discusses the decisions in Bennett and Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  The minority (Lords Phillips, Roger and Brown) went further, finding that this lack of causation should have prevented a cause of action accruing at all. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:45 am by firstamendmentblogger
In today’s Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at how the Court’s ruling in the violent video games case presents Justice Scalia’s and Justice Thomas’s sharply divergent views on what speech rights minors can claim under the First Amendment. [read post]