Search for: "California Department Corrections"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 3,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2012, 12:19 pm
Automatic break cases have been oh so… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm
Beydoun, The New Crusades: Islamophobia and the Global War on Muslims (University of California Press 2023) The New Crusades examines Islamophobia as a global phenomenon, detailing how the American War on Terror has facilitated and intensified the network of anti-Muslim campaigns unfolding across the world. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:40 pm
Prior to the hearing, the OFCCP’s understanding of Google’s organizational structure and pay policies and practices was lacking, but Wagner’s testimony corrected errors and filled in gaps, the ALJ noted. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:02 am
For example, the California Department of Motor Vehicles reports that drivers between ages 16 and 24 are more inclined to use their cell phones when driving, even though state law bans all cell phone use for drivers under age 18. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Where the dispute is solely one of contract interpretation and there is no evidence of animus, bad faith, or intent to undermine the union, the Board does not seek to determine which of two equally plausible contract interpretations is correct. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398, 404-05 (1999), the difference is one of intent: “Bribery requires intent ‘to influence’ an official act or ‘to be influenced’ in an official act. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:05 pm
Not long after that, I discussed the first expensive law-related app: BarMax, a $999 California bar review app. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
Among the many problems that have come to light in the current cryptocurrency craze have been problems relating to celebrity endorsements for initial coin offerings (ICO). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 8:01 pm
Here in Texas and Brazos County, Marlene Gebauer 0:55 you’re partially correct. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Not surprisingly, I don’t see any persuasive argument for giving Wyoming and California equal voting power. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
If the voter made a mistake, or the computer made an error recording it, the voter can return to the previous screen to correct the error.[17] At the same time, computerized systems have all of the other advantages of being a computer, as well. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Russell B. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (IP ThinkTank), (further discussion from IAM and e^(ip)) Illusory world of trade secret protection – Discussion of S Schreter’s article ‘Inside entrepreneurship: Patent protection isn’t only option’: (IPBiz) Global – Copyright Illegal art: (Patry Copyright Blog), Events 1-3 June: ACC Europe 2008 annual conference ‘Becoming a global legal manager: Developing the skills you will need to manage the… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
., is vice chair of the Department of Integrative Medicine, director of Continuing Medical Education, and co-director of the Fellowship in Integrative Medicine at Beth Israel's Continuum Center for Health and Healing at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:16 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ), which seemed to stifle the new age fraud’s growth in its tracks. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/287556.opn.doc.pdf In a concurrence, Judge Sweeney argued that the holding of the court with regard to the partially audible testimony admitted into evidence was probably correct, but that the issue was not one of constitutional magnitude, but rather was an evidentiary issue. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
” California, for example, is a non-judicial foreclosure state, meaning foreclosures do not require the prior approval of a court. [read post]
