Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 3881 - 3900 of 11,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 17-1003. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:09 am by HRWatchdog
In January, a district court judge barred the administration from ending the program for individuals with DACA status, but precluding new DACA applications from being accepted. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
“The state bar associations are justified by the state’s compelling government interest in regulating the practice of law before its courts,” he explained. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:49 pm
When considered in context and in light of Riley’s testimony that he was attending law school and that a renewed restraining order might affect his ability to gain admittance to the state bar, the court’s statement shows it did consider Riley’s law school attendance in its decision but did not find the evidence compelling. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:21 am by Amy Howe
Today the justices agreed to consider whether, in these circumstances, the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment bars the state from executing him. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am by Rachel Sandler
The Act grants the USOC exclusive rights to the word “Olympic” in almost any commercial setting.[7]  In 1987, the United States Supreme Court enjoined a California-based athletics company from using the word “Olympics” finding that the Act went beyond normal trademark protections. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Keith E. Whittington
In such cases, proponents of departmentalism argued that the courts had allowed Congress to do by statute what it had been barred from doing under the Constitution. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Union of India [pdf], where the Indian Supreme Court ruled that political candidates and relatives right to privacy bars disclosure of their source of income. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6262 Issue: Whether, under the Supreme Court’s opinions in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6769 Issues: Whether, under the Supreme Court’s opinions in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held that a guilty plea does not bar a defendant from challenging the constitutionality of the statute of conviction on direct appeal. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
And also, the fact that if you sue an insurance company in state court, and the carrier has a basis upon which to remove the case to federal court, they’re going to do it. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
And also, the fact that if you sue an insurance company in state court, and the carrier has a basis upon which to remove the case to federal court, they’re going to do it. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
  The basis of 3Taps’s complaint is last year’s hotly-debated California district court ruling (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Two years later, another challenge to the agency fees returned to the Supreme Court, this time brought there by a group of California public-school teachers. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 6:24 am
The dominant features in the shareholder litigation environment in California today are fragmentation and uncertainty: Plaintiffs’ bar fragmentation means ‘too small to sue’ no longer applies Uncertainty as to whether IPO lawsuits can be brought in state court or only Federal Uncertainty in the evolution of merger and fiduciary duty suits Uncertainty as to the strength of the Safe Harbor for forward looking statements Uncertainty as to the… [read post]