Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 3881 - 3900 of 8,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2022, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
    Earlier this year, in January, the Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M University also reported on the results of the Harris County settlement in O’Donnell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
Huang v Northern Star Management LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32194(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 24, 2016]. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:30 am
The form (i.e., equity v. long-term cash) and terms and conditions of the long-term incentive awards shall be determined by [Merrill] in consultation with [Bank of America] … The allocation of the 2008 VICP among eligible employees shall be determined by [Merrill] in consultation with [Bank of America]. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:57 pm by Giles Peaker
Diaz v Karim [2017] EWHC 595 (QB) The schedule of special damages – never straightforward. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff also alleges that Marshall was given the keys to his car and was permitted to leave the facility with $900 in cash, which he had earned from a part-time job while he was in treatment. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, Buyers sued Plaintiffs for conversion, seeking $1.8 million by alleging that Plaintiffs wrongfully took possession of that sum, which was purportedly made as a “cash down payment on the Property” (NYSCEF # 9 ¶ 20). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major (although… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major (although… [read post]