Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 3881 - 3900 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire,… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
      Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
§§ 1541-48) to the Supreme Court’s 1983 opinion in INS v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The Doughty Street Chambers website has a comment  on the recent judgment in the case of Versi v Husain [2023] EWHC 482 (KB). [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am by Frank Cranmer
Unsurprisingly in view of the Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the Court held (though only by five votes to two) that there has been a violation of Article 8. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
The Grand Chamber had ruled in Silih that the procedural obligations imposed by Article 2 were binding on Slovenia in respect of a contested death which had occurred prior to that State’s ratification of the Convention, though the investigation into the death took place largely post ratification: “The procedural obligation to carry out an effective investigation under Article 2 has evolved into a separate and autonomous duty [which] … can be considered to be a… [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]