Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 7,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:38 pm
In Jedwards International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:31 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:01 pm
We explain that the ’358 patent is plainly invalid under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am
Member States may however allow a work to be used, without its author’s consent, for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:35 pm
Even for SEPs, despite the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:24 am
The case of combit Software GmbH v Commit Business Solutions Ltd dealt with combit Software, a German software development and marketing company that holds the rights to the EU trademark for the word "combit" for similar goods and services. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Their argument is based on an unpublished NJ Appellate Division decision, Bass v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 2:30 pm
The case, Brummer v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:29 pm
The case, for those of you who might be interested, was Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) v Exxonmobil Financial Services BV [2016] EWHC 2699 (Comm). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:08 am
In 1923, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
United States? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
"No image (rights) availableToday's judgmentKitchin LJ started his analysis by confirming what Birss J had stated in his judgment, ie that "[t]here is in English law no "image right" or "character right" which allows a celebrity to control the use of his or her name or image. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube relates the tale of a South African wine brand dispute (Alto v Altus) which ended with Altus preferring a name change (to Fenix) to the prospect of defending a trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:26 am
Creel Abogados, S.C. and Carlos Creel Carrera v. [read post]
