Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 11,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 7:41 am
Vernon V. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:41 am
Vernon V. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am
This is why Spokeo was presumed to be subject to the FCRA in the recent Supreme Court case, Spokeo v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:55 pm
Sumitomo objected stating that English courts alone had the jurisdiction to set aside the arbitral award. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm
The article goes on to consider the implications of the English decisions and their remedial consequences, including the possibility of seeking an award of damages for breach of the Regulation. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
Vernon V. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
This could not be satisfied on the facts, because the 'third party' is the EPO/English Court, and there was no question of their "freedom to deal" with the English health authorities being affected. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:19 am
Thus, the requirements established in Circular 033/2016 for registering 3D trademarks were not fulfilled.Turning to designs, David Musker blogs on MARQUES CLASS 99 about the case Chanel SAS v EUIPO, ECLI:EU:T:207:517, T-57/16 (not in English yet). [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
”—Peter Charles Hoffer, author of Rutgers v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
” Curtis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:32 am
A very interesting decision handed down Wednesday by a New York appellate court (Weisberger v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:58 am
Robins v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
WMATA will undoubtedly rely heavily on Lehman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:39 am
Additional Resources: Grotheer v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Engel v Edmonton Police Association, 2017 ABQB 495 [87] I agree that given Mr. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:07 am
When the Supreme Court extended the right of assembly beyond the federal government to the states in its unanimous 1937 decision, De Jonge v. [read post]
