Search for: "Files v. State"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 91,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am
By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 2, 2021, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(2) and (5), and the matter was referred to the Honorable Sondra M. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
A judge should not order civil contempt if you file for criminal, and vice versa, which is what happened in the case of Hirschler v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
§164.524(a)(1) states: Right of access. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
In Children of the Kingdon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
On June 29, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a historic decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
On June 29, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a historic decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
IP rights define boundaries of exclusion, inclusion and belonging, tied to nation-state building. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:04 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 10:48 am
See Phillips v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
For example, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in WeRide Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
See Bd. of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
West v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Sissel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
The law (19 USC 1514(a)) provides that specified decisions of Customs are “final and conclusive upon all persons (including the United States and any officer thereof) unless a protest is filed . . . . [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Louis and Davis v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:08 pm
Arostegui-Maldonado v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:28 am
” Ineligible if merely “stating a functional result. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:55 am
Background Corning Optical Communications LLC (“Corning”) filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) alleging that FS.COM violated § 337 by importing high-density fiber optic equipment into the United States that infringed Corning’s patents. [read post]
