Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 44,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
In many cases, there's indeed no such state-created right. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The AUSAs are so much better funded, the prosecutors are so vigorous, the sentences are so long, and (critically) in federal court you've got to actually serve at least 85% of your sentence whereas in state court you generally only serve half (with good behavior).It almost seems like piling on; just adding to the indignities and practical harms that arise from relegating Native Americans to isolated reservations.Now, again, in these particular cases, I get it, it's hard… [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
Taxes for people who can afford really good tax professionals; not so much. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
At SCOTUSBLOG, Rory Little has written a very good summary of the Supreme Court's first case of the upcoming Term, Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:17 pm
Ultimately, Chief Justice Roberts concluded that the Court was confused in Williamson County because there really was no good reason for the “state litigation rule. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:38 am
The good news is that Medtronic v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:38 am
The good news is that Medtronic v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:25 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
I also fondly remember Carl's win in State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
The lower court determined that the state violated the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act by failing to negotiate in good faith for a tribal-state gaming compact. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:04 am
The case against Dick's Sporting Goods -- which raises the claim discussed here last week -- is Watson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am
The case considered the EU policy of parallel imports, and addressed the question of whether an importer of goods bearing a registered mark into the EEA without the consent of the trade mark proprietor is entitled to defend an action for trade mark infringement on the basis that the proprietor is engaged in conduct calculated to: obstruct the free movement of goods between member states; or distort competition in the EEA market for the goods (the so called… [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
Horiuchi states that he believed in good faith that the Italian Government did not claim ownership to the Defendant in rem because, as Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:14 pm
The petition of the day is: Jarvis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm
Either makes sense.But if you're doing the latter, I think you'd have to do something a little different than either of the Smiths does here.Both have very good points. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
