Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 3881 - 3900 of 6,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm by Dan Bushell
In France, the former husband, sued his former wife for recording phone calls without his consent. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
Melvin Lowe (NFP) - In a 2-1 opinion, Judge Kirsch concludes: "In light of the total distribution of marital property, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award Wife Husband's survivor benefit. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am by Sam Hasler
Children from an earlier marriage or relationship are not included as children of the present marriage - even if they are living with you and your spouse.Something trickier occurs when a question arises as to whether the husband is the father of the wife's child. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:44 pm by Brian D. Zuccaro, Esq.
The Court rejected the husband's argument that his wife could not meet the domicile requirement because her TN visa status permitted only a temporary stay in the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 9:07 am by Venkat
The situation in this case is more akin to someone walking into a video rental store with their wife or husband and overhearing a clerk’s reference to a previous rental record (maybe in the context of a late fee discussion). [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:42 am by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
  A former marital home of a divorced couple was still homestead and owned as tenants in common, notwithstanding that the former husband no longer lived there and had remarried and that the former wife occupied the home under the marital settlement agreement only until the youngest child of the marriage graduated high school. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:06 am
Dupont, 555 U.S. __, 129 S.Ct. 865 (2009), in which the Court held that an ex-wife's waiver of rights to her ex-husband's benefits, as part of a divorce decree, did not validly divest the ex-wife of her rights to those benefits, absent some amendment of the Plan designation form or "succeeding designation of an alternate payee. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pursuant to the settlement, Carr agreed to pay $25,000 of his wifes legal fees as well as all of his own legal fees. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 8:40 am by Moseley Collins
The 4th cause of action, specifically states in paragraph 47 of the complaint that it is brought pursuant to Thing v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
No such limitation is applicable here and we perceive no "dangerous precedent" ensuing from a denial after trial of the plaintiff's application for authorization to return to the premises he and the defendant once shared as husband and wife. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]