Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 3881 - 3900 of 4,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2010, 11:58 am by Marta Requejo
The ECJ’s judgment in case C- 211/10 PPU was pronounced on 1 July 2010; it has been published today (OJ C 234, 28 August 2010). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
The firm’s lawyers utilize their clients’ interests in order to determine where the focus of the foundation will be. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Anapol Schwartz
The firm’s lawyers utilize their clients’ interests in order to determine where the focus of the foundation will be. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
But something different began with the European enslavement of Africans from the 15th c. onwards. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:32 am by Stephen Page
Fear of harm to others may restrict your willingness to resist and/or to follow through with police, Department of Child Safety and the courts.Parental interference and parental kidnapping are too common in domestic violence cases. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
Arbitration Act, L. 2003, c. 95 (codified as N.J.S.A. 2A:23B-1 to -32). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
"These bills fix a broken process that produced extended and contentious litigation, poisoned feelings between the parties and harmed the interests of those persons - too often women - who did not have sufficient financial wherewithal to protect their legal rights. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm by cdw
R. 416(c) was untimely because the rule was directory and defendant’s rights were protected as he was provided with additional attorneys who specialized in death penalty cases. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
This is the presumption of resulting trust, and in British Columbia it applies to transfers from a parent to an adult child, but not from a parent to a minor child. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm by Meg Martin
The district court was required pursuant to § 20-2-204(c) to determine what custody arrangement was in the child’s best interest.Witness and exhibit designations: Father did not provide witnesses and exhibits to Mother within the thirty day limit set by W.R.C.P. 37. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:31 am by PaulKostro
My legal services include family law, divorce, child support, litigation, arbitration, mediation, child custody and visitation, alimony, equitable distribution, separation agreements, [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Attorney’s Office described their alleged criminal acts as follows: Taking action to remove funding for the Luzerne County juvenile detention facility, effectively closing that facility; Ordering juveniles to be sent to the facilities in which they had a financial interest even when juvenile probation officers did not recommend detention; Entering a “Placement Guarantee Agreement” to house children in a facility in which the judges had an interest, guaranteeing… [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm by Paul Jacobson
This poses a very interesting and troublesome challenge to anyone who operates a website which caters for or may even be aimed at children. [read post]