Search for: "In re J. C." Results 3881 - 3900 of 4,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
Typical legal matters include:* incorporating nonprofit corporations* applying to the IRS for tax exempt status* drafting and negotiating contracts* providing legal advice to nonprofit board of directors and staff* drafting lending and real estate documents* assisting businesses with choice of entity decisionsThe Clinic will also offer a special tract involving policy development: At least four of the students in the Clinic will focus on assisting community groups develop local and statewide policy… [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Drummond c. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
”  See In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 671 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
You can read those posts for an introduction to the issue if you’re unfamiliar with it, but the short version is that in California (and some other states), the courts give constitutional protection not only to the amount of public employees’ pensions that has been earned by past service, but also to employees’ right to keep earning a pension based on rules that are at least as generous for as long as they stay employed. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
Francis points out that “[c]ritics and supporters of the bill say … [it] will never fly under constitutional grounds because “residents and citizens are entitled to privileges. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Cárdenas and his supporters held months of public protests, but beyond that there was little could do to challenge the official results. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]