Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 5,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Key ideals about Part III 1. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
Unfortunately the provision for increase in rent as introduced by amendment to the Act w.e.f. 1 st December, 1988 with insertion of Section 6A was not noticed by the said Division Bench.20. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
On May 10, 2019, the SEC proposed a series of rule amendments and guidance with the intention of improving the regulatory framework governing cross-border security-based swaps. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1] [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Upon the LUC’s request, DW submitted a written status report on June 10 showing its progress on this and other work on the property. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
As this matter was based on the diversity jurisdiction of the court, under Federal Rules of Evidence 501, California law would apply. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
(Denver was part of Arapahoe County until the adoption of the home rule constitutional amendment in 1902.) [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Dep’t of the Army, Field Manual No. 27-10, The Law of Land Warfare ¶ 500 (July 18, 1956) (as amended by Change No. 1 of July 15, 1976) (“Conspiracy, direct incitement, and attempts to commit, as well as complicity in the commission of, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes are punishable.”). [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
This case concerns a divisional application in which a feature was removed from claim 1 with respect to claim 1 of the parent application, and whether such removal satisfies the requirements of Art. 76(1) EPC (and equivalently Art. 123(2) if it were to be performed as amendment).This situation is dealt with by the 'essentiality test' of T 331/87.This case discusses the essentiality test as it differs across its various versions (English original vs.… [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
Art. 2(1) EPC). [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 11:57 pm
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
26 May 2012, 12:06 am
As a practical matter, many early-stage startup companies that are considering crowdfunding may have only been recently incorporated and have not yet filed tax returns. [read post]
26 May 2012, 12:06 am
As a practical matter, many early-stage startup companies that are considering crowdfunding may have only been recently incorporated and have not yet filed tax returns. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Rich’s matter for resentencing within the standard range. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:02 pm
In proposing the leverage rule, the NFA stated that it “believes that the amendments [100:1 and 25:1 leverage] are the best way to address NFA’s customer protection concerns with certain FDMs’ use of leverage. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:01 am
Following Dutch Industries, 2006 statutory amendments provided options to avoid “harsh consequences” of loss of patent rights associated with issues regarding past fee payments. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Judge Tatel counters that this is routine when Congress seeks to amend legislation? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:57 am
These rules apply to all family law matters in all California courtrooms. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:57 am
These rules apply to all family law matters in all California courtrooms. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
(pp. 5-10)2. [read post]