Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 21,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2019, 9:19 am
Suppose that you slip and fall at the defendant’s retail store due to a slick floor. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:44 am
The parents of the child appealed the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Royal Plus, Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
The District Court dismissed the case in favor of the defendants and Ms. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:56 pm
Brillon - (1) Whether continuances and delays caused solely by an indigent defendant's public defender can arise to a speedy trial right violation, and be charged against the State pursuant to the test in Barker v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
Last week's decision in Atkinson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 3:05 pm
(The airbag manufacturer was also a defendant in the case, and was also found not liable by the jury). [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:23 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently held that plaintiff, who first initiated arbitration against the defendant’s subsidiary but then commenced a lawsuit against its parent, must establish the subsidiary's liability in arbitration before filing any claims that purport to pierce the subsidiary's corporate veil. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:03 am
The defendant appealed. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Moreover, the court found that the subcontractor was not liable for indemnity or contribution under its contract. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 7:37 pm
Defendant then sued Plaintiff, claiming it was liable because it provided no training on the operation of the space heaters to Defendant.Analysis:The Court of Special Appeals agreed with the Montgomery County Circuit Court that Red Coats’ settlement with Upper Rock does not preclude Red Coats from seeking contribution from GCI under Maryland’s UCATA.Citing Homeseekers’ Realty v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:49 am
" In finding some of the words actionable, the Court permitted the case to proceed where the blogger "kept [defendant's] name and likeness on his website during the peak of the Departed and blocked work from [defendant]," that "[plaintiff] lied to many people taking credit when he brought nothing to the table" and "used [defendant's] name ... to lure people to the business" were factual, and thus provided a… [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:51 am
The plaintiffs claim that a railroad embankment adjacent to the plaintiffs’ property collapsed during a rain event and that the defendant should be held liable. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
Specifically, the defendant objected to the admission of questions and testimony about whether the defendant’s father warned members of the church about the defendant’s potential dangerousness. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
[D]drug manufacturers are not strictly liable for a risk that was not known or reasonably scientifically knowable. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:26 am
The most noteworthy aspect of Judge Kramer’s opinion is his statement of the bases on which he rejected the defendants’ argument that they could not be held liable for their ratings opinions because the opinions are protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
Therefore, the Court concludes that the Defendants violated the Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right against unlawful searches. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
As a result, the defendant often seeks discovery of, among other things, Customs and Border Protection’s or Homeland Security Investigation’s Report of Investigation, which is the extremely tedious document that details the government’s investigation into the alleged violation. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:33 am
Barker); -held the RIAA's evidence inconclusive as to whether the defendant was the person who actually put the files in a 'shared files folder'; and -held the RIAA's evidence inconclusive as to whether the defendant could be held liable under a "secondary liability" theory.This is the Arizona case in which (a) the Court initially ruled in the RIAA's favor, (b) after receiving a "reconsideration"… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
As suggested in case law such as Amstrad CBS Songs v Amstrad [1998] 1 AC 1013, procurement, whether by inducement, incitement or persuasion, “must be by a defendant to an individual infringer and must identifiably procure a particular infringement in order to make the defendant liable as a joint infringer”. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:58 am
The appellate court made clear that the rescue doctrine applies when a defendant endangers him/herself: “The question here is whether an actor is liable for injuries sustained by a person who is trying to rescue the actor from his own negligence. [read post]
