Search for: "Long v State" Results 3881 - 3900 of 45,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm
In this response Essay, I argue: first, that Lepore's marginalization of Article V's convention mechanism is in tension with her own historical and normative account; second, that while Lepore's wariness of conventions is entirely understandable given the state of our politics—and entirely commonplace among progressives—it carries significant risks of its own; and third, that constitutional conventions are not as unfamiliar as they might seem and that our… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am by Keith E. Whittington
North Carolina State University] I noted last month that a Fourth Circuit panel had handed down a divided decision in Porter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
". . . . defendant continued yelling before walking out, stating, 'You know[] what? [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
Goliath in web-scraping litigation than the long-standing legal dispute between Ryanair v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
  On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 7:07 am by Ronald Mann
Indeed, to the outsider the most remarkable thing about the argument next week in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am by Jeff Welty
North Carolina, the burned-out brake light case in which the state supreme court ruled that an investigative stop may be based on an officer’s mistake of law, so long as the mistake is reasonable. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]