Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
On May 11, 2011, SB 408 was presented to Governor Scott, who signed the legislation into law on May 17, 2011 (Chapter Law 2011-39). [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
" Further, Domestic Relations Law 236(B)(9)(b) provides that a party may seek downward modification if he or she has experienced a "substantial change in circumstances:" There is no limit to the number of times a party may seek downward modification. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:26 am by Tasha C. Taylor
P. 54(b); see also The Rule 54(b) Trap: Dealing with Non-final Orders in Cases with Multiple Claims or Multiple Parties. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:31 pm by David Kopel
P. 65(d)(1), nor does it provide ‘explicit notice of precisely what conduct is outlawed,’ Schmidt, 414 U.S. at 476. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Accordingly, the matter was remitted to the Family Court for clarification of this matter. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:22 pm
  Several cases were relevant to matters I'm presently working on, so I'm sure many of you will similarly find a number of these cases of interest. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Michael O'Brien
  The first word on the matter was Judge Neal Peters McCurn in Indium Corp. of America v. [read post]