Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 3881 - 3900 of 20,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As a corollary, because the argument that A’s downfall should also void some or all of B-Z is a substantive claim on the merits, the court may entertain such a claim only when it is presented by a party who has standing to raise it, meaning one who is injured by the provision(s) B-Z that might fall.In our view, both the majority and minority positions are partly right and partly wrong. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:36 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(B) Why would anyone ever take less maintenance than what the court would order? [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
 by Agnieszka Sztoldman “On 17 September the CJEU handed down a long-awaited judgment on a matter that thrilled sports fans and the IP community (C-449/18P, C-474/18P, available in French and Spanish). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
 by Agnieszka Sztoldman “On 17 September the CJEU handed down a long-awaited judgment on a matter that thrilled sports fans and the IP community (C-449/18P, C-474/18P, available in French and Spanish). [read post]
Among other things, the judgment refers to French law to which it reserves a strange fate, a real legal “je t’aime moi non plus”. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
Perhaps he won’t, and Congress will override his veto (that’s my prediction). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It didn’t matter that there was no explicit reference in the reviews to defendants or their products. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Thus, this decision is in no way a matter of a debit order submitted without comment, which the Board of Appeal considered an implicit request for correction. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 5:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
Haile held it wasn't a state constitutional mandate, citing Powers v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:07 pm by Joy Waltemath
Just one week later, on October 8, the DOL and DHS published the rules at issue in this lawsuit, a response the court described as the “embodiment of the adage ‘if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Trump Has Discussed with Advisers Pardons for His 3 Eldest Children and Giuliani New York Times – Maggie Haberman and Michael Schmidt | Published: 12/1/2020 President Trump has discussed with advisers whether to grant pre-emptive pardons to his children, to his son-in-law, and to his personal lawyer Rudolph Giuliani, and talked with Giuliani about pardoning him as recently as last week, according to two people briefed on the matter. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm by Josh Blackman
It isn’t clear whether Durham could challenge his termination based on the loss of his salary. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:08 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
It is seen as an advantage that time and costs can be saved and, in particular, that the impact on the environment can also be reduced. b. [read post]