Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2012, 6:51 am
On August 22, 2012, the SEC adopted its final rule related to conflict minerals required by Congress under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), which will require all public companies to implement complex new controls and procedural mechanisms, and in certain cases, conduct supply chain due diligence that could lead to new public disclosures. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
An infringing use is not a bona fide offering of goods or services. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 11:55 am
Our good colleague Mark Senn touched on this topic in a recent article in the ABA-RPTE magazine -Probate and Property. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm
What follows might be called a good lawsuit spoiled. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
This … … leads to this The material for this extensive post comes from a whole series of intriguing pieces, including a lengthy essay by Mark Kitto in Prospect Magazine (August 8, 2012) (brown text); a sweeping historical blog essay by C. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:30 am
Thus a mark which is similar to a mark already registered or used for similar goods will not be allowed registration. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:19 am
Personal service should remain the cornerstone of jurisdiction, bounded by the pillars of comity, reciprocity, good faith and order and fairness. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
To be clear, fair use is a good thing; being able to refer to others’ marks in expressive use is a good thing. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:30 am
® means the owner actually has federally-registered the designation as a trademark or a service mark (I suppose it also could mean the designation is registered as a certification mark or collective mark, but those are few and far between) for the goods or services covered by the symbol’s use — for more details on the proper use of the ® notice symbol, check my post from a few years back: Registration Symbol Misuse As Trademark Fraud? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:48 am
Although the applied-for marks are not identical to the registered design, there is a "C-scoop" in each.We note that the C-scoop is but one aspect of what appears as a “muscle car” in the overall “outward appearance of a vehicle” that is captured by the descriptions in the marks in each of the three applications. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 2:28 pm
Bills +3 over the JETS At this point I think the J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS are the only ones that don’t know Mark Sanchez S-U-C-K-S SUCKS SUCKS SUCKS. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:16 am
Mark Houldin has accepted a job with the National Legal Aid and Defender Association(NLADA). [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:13 am
Mark Houldin has accepted a job with the National Legal Aid and Defender Association (NLADA). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:31 pm
I find this book very useful as a good first source on Chinese legal issues. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:55 am
Thus, there is no basis for reducing a state’s obligation below its “mark” (the significance level). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:22 pm
[10] Techno Ethics, Challenges in Emerging Technology, Mark L. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Caron, C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:43 am
" The Board focused on six registrations for marks that it deemed closest to Applicant's mark and covering goods that are "most likely to support a finding of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
§ 3267(1)(C), (2)(C) (excepting all “national[s] of or [those] ordinarily resident in the host nation”). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:21 pm
Did you know that in 1896, Roy C. [read post]
