Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 7,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
Plus, plaintiffs didn’t explain how the confusion would happen given that Bidart wasn’t alleged to have used any marks associated with plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
E. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Long-awaited Money Market Regulatory Reform Falls Short Jill E. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 5:21 pm
Which is probably how the question managed to get, not just to the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
- Norman E. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
How to deal with that, wonders Neil? [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:53 am
Bohrer · Kathleen Boozang * · Leslie Francis · Abbe Gluck · Mark Hall · Nan Hunter · Joan Krause * … [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
Trade Secret and Non-Compete Legislative Update The fourth webinar in the series, presented by Katherine E. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
D#, E, B, C) were considered insufficient as they do not explain the exact noise, timing or pitch of a sound, leaving significant room for interpretation. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Intrigued, I sent an e-mail describing Mr. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
., at 5) (some internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
How bizarre, sniffs Merpel, calling for Swedish Katfriends' help.* More on Product-by-Process claims - what is the law, why is it, and what should it be? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Schnapper’s argument also was marked by several instances in which Justices interposed themselves between Schnapper and other Justices, helping to redirect the argument. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
So here are three of the biggest pitfalls trademark attorneys see when it comes to trying to use websites as specimens, and how you can avoid them: 1. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 10:05 pm
That is certainly a symbol that lawyers need to type a lot, but it isn't immediately apparent how to do so on an iPhone or iPad. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
How the high court will rule, however, remains a disturbingly open question. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:55 pm
This is a marked departure from some early decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal in a sexual harassment context, such as Bannister v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:09 pm
Robertson Oklahoma City lawyer Mark A. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Neither TRIPS nor the Paris Convention specify the framework within which product shapes are protected, though it seems to be an almost universal phenomenon that national law makes some sort of special provision for them.Annette then took the audience through a sequence of shape-as-trade-mark decisions involving Community trade mark registration: C-371/06 Benetton v G-Star, T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen (illustrated right) and Hauck/Stokke (the TRIPP TRAPP case, discussed… [read post]
