Search for: "Moring v. State" Results 3881 - 3900 of 130,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 11:31 am by JURIST Staff
The most remarkable aspect of this judgment is the Additional Note of Justice Athar Minallah, who expressed the importance of elections by stating, “The State cannot be governed in the absence of the chosen representatives for more than the ninety days expressly provided for holding the general elections followed by election of a leader of the House. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am by Eric Goldman
Even so, the law still compels regulated entities to sort users by age, and the law uses a more stringent test than COPPA. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Oh, and, yet more coincidentally, guess who joined Judge William Fletcher's opinion in Wolfe? [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
However, I hold the Constitution more dearly than I despise his tenure. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm by Amy Howe
He urged the state court to apply a test outlined by the Supreme Court in two property rights cases, Nollan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  In our experience, it tends to be more expeditious, that is, it tends to make the process of jury selection faster. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am by Justin Mahramas
Assembly Bill 1307 AB 1307, unanimously passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on September 7, 2023, was crafted in response to the court ruling in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]