Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3881 - 3900 of 4,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
  The majority, however, found that outcome would better serve the spirit and letter of the FAA than allowing parties to use a challenge to another aspect of the agreement to skirt an otherwise valid arbitration provision. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
§101—i.e., whether the invention produced a “useful, concrete, and tangible result,” see, e.g., State Street Bank & Trust Co v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
’ In light of this, it is important to acknowledge that the creation of a ‘chilling effect’ on freedom of expression is precisely the purpose of libel law. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:06 pm by Larry Downes
I’m late to the party, but I wanted to say a few things about the District Court’s decision in the Viacom v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Salinger: Judge Calabrese did suggest that the PI standard has been changed across the board. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:09 am by Bill
I was reminded of this when reading Dibble v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm by Gene Quinn
The undersigned amici differ in their views on precisely what standard should be applied to judge the legality of exclusionary settlements. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
However, it would be in the public interest to follow BMI Bertollo and OHIM standards of practice. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Richard Renner
ALI stuck its flag firmly in the past, choosing to use its influence to reject modern human resources standards that require documentation of grounds for discipline, and the use of progressive discipline. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:23 am by Steve McConnell
" That lower standard is permissible, the Keller court tells us, if there are "special circumstances. [read post]