Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
To assist with that decision the Court examines two earlier cases on this point.The first is Cardiff City Council v Stone [2003] EWCA Civ 298. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am
Whilst state practice can be found in support (see Filártiga v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
The June 11 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
“[V]ery serious violent offences” can outweigh an Art 8 claim “even if they were committed by a minor”. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The decisions are In re: New Jersey Title Insurance Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,921 and McCray v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:15 am
Federal Circuit on Software Patents: Show Me the AlgorithmsEarlier today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Noah Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
The Government, in its response to the consultation, stated that the purpose of the mandatory ground was to "speed up the [eviction] process to better protect victims in the most serious cases of anti-social behaviour and criminality" rather than to increase the number of evictions (para 4.27). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
The Government, in its response to the consultation, stated that the purpose of the mandatory ground was to "speed up the [eviction] process to better protect victims in the most serious cases of anti-social behaviour and criminality" rather than to increase the number of evictions (para 4.27). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
., 44 PERB ¶3024, U-28437, U-28483 The Board affirmed the dismissal of a charge by the Tompkins County Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:21 pm
She relied by analogy on the decision of the House in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, where the House considered the article 8 right to respect for the home. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:03 am
(CCH) ¶ 34048 (Jan. 6, 2009)). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:51 am
(Unifund, at para. 74) This trend has continued with the Van Breda Trilogy. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:44 pm
" Hamilton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Unjust enrichment is the unjust receipt of any benefit (Paras 152, 153, 159) 152. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
Barney, “The Quagmire of the State Income Tax Nexus in the Wake of KFC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
