Search for: "Parks v. State"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 10,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Brooks v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Williamson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
Park replied that “every institution in every state will differ” when it comes to the time necessary to achieve diversity. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:00 pm
LePage Bakeries Park St. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
"' Order ¶18 & n.4 (quoting Smithfield Business Park, LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Roberto Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
The city and village also noted that not all states share the views of those 38, saying that the state of Illinois is going to enter the case to support Chicago and Oak Park, and may be joined in that by additional states. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Crane, supra.The court goes on to point out that inPulka, Plaintiffs sued not only the driver who struck a pedestrian, but also the owners of a parking garage. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:41 am
Penn State University, University Park, PA April 21, 2017.Larry Catá Backer (Professor, Penn State University)I have been tasked with the great responsibility of closing this excellent conference. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Frost, 17-949 Issue: Whether the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act prohibits the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over state, native corporation, and private land physically located within the boundaries of the national park system in Alaska. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
DuVernay stated that she wanted to hold Ms. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am
” Cole v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 10:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:20 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in State Water Contractors v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:48 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 10:45 am
Supreme Court's outrageously expansive interpretation of the concept in Kelo v. [read post]
