Search for: "People v J." Results 3881 - 3900 of 7,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2015, 5:32 am
As Justice Mustang wrote for the Untied States Supreme Court in in the semenal 2010 case of Clouseau v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
While there has not been a great deal of case-law on the application of section 9 to date, the early signs are that courts will apply it strictly: see Ahuja and the very recent (brief and obiter) analysis of section 9 by Nicklin J in Huda v Wells and ors [2017] EWHC 2553 (QB) at [84]-[85]. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Are they going to tell the truth or are they going to trash people, lie about their families? [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The story of how Indigenous peoples were included within the state could be avoided with bland statements—such as, “there was from the outset never any doubt that sovereignty and legislative power, and indeed the underlying title, to [Aboriginal] lands vested in the Crown” (R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075, Dickson C.J. and La Forest J. at 1103). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  It is questionable whether a response to an anticipated attack would be covered by privilege (in Bento Bean J said “[103] … I see no policy reason to extend qualified privilege to people who believe they are about to be criticised and decide to get their public retaliation in first). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Typical is a case in Michigan: T & J Towing v Kurtz. [read post]